Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10970 14
Original file (NR10970 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

EGA
Docket No: 10970-14
2 April 2015

 

This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request
dated 22 September 2014. vou previously petitioned the Board

and were advised in our letter that your applications had been
granted partial relief.

Although your application was submitted without any new evidence
not previously considered: the Board found it in the interest of

Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on
20 March 2015. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request. Documentary material considered

“reconsideration, the decision of the Board is final, and your
only recourse would be to initiate action, at no cost to the
‘Board, to a court of appropriate jurisdiction.

 

Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13252 14

    Original file (NR13252 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4331 14

    Original file (NR4331 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your most recent application based on the new evidence provided. In this regard, your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11509 14

    Original file (NR11509 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the documentation that you provided, even though not previously considered by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11978 14

    Original file (NR11978 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the documentation that you provided, even though not previously considered by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12510 14

    Original file (NR12510 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. In the absence of sufficiently material evidence for reconsideration, the decision of the Board is final, and your only recourse would be to initiate action, at no cost to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1165 14

    Original file (NR1165 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    on S November 2013, You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 23 October 2013, that your application had been denied. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 24 February 2015. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11606 14

    Original file (NR11606 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11076 14

    Original file (NR11076 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12100 14

    Original file (NR12100 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. ~ After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statement you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11689 14

    Original file (NR11689 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...